Topic Study

Election

Overview

Introduction

Election is one of the most talked-about topics in discussions of Calvinism and soteriology, often sparking confusion and heated debate. It is a term that can polarize, especially when misunderstood. Non-Calvinists might be tempted to recoil from the idea, saying, "I hate that election stuff." But election is a biblical word, and all Bible-believing Christians should affirm some type of election. The debate lies in what election means and how it works. Non-Calvinists shouldn't reject election; we reject the Calvinist interpretation of election.

The Calvinist Understanding of Election

The definition of election that non-Calvinists oppose is any form of the following:

God, before the foundation of the world, chose to make certain individuals the objects of His unmerited favor or special grace. ... He instead chose to save some and leave others to the consequences of their sin.

— GotQuestions.org, "What is unconditional election?"

John Calvin stated the doctrine even more starkly:

Predestination we call the eternal decree of God, by which he hath determined, in himself, what he would have to become of every individual of mankind. For they are not all created with a similar destiny; but eternal life is foreordained for some, and eternal damnation for others. Every man, therefore, being created for one or the other of these ends, we say he is predestinated either to life or to death.

— John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion 3.21.5

This view is called unconditional election: God chooses particular individuals for salvation without regard to anything in them, including their faith. Calvinists differ on how to describe the rest. Many speak of God "passing over" the non-elect and leaving them in their sin, as the GotQuestions statement does. Calvin and others speak of God actively ordaining them to damnation, which is often called double predestination. In either form, the decision of who will be saved is made by God alone, before anyone is born.

Calvinists hold this view to protect real biblical concerns: that salvation is entirely of grace, that no one can boast, and that God's purposes cannot fail. We don't question their sincerity or passion for Scripture, and we believe they reach their conclusions while honestly searching the Scriptures for truth. We simply disagree with their conclusions. The issue lies in their presuppositions and interpretations, not their intentions.

Non-Calvinists find this understanding of election troubling because it conflicts with the way God reveals His own character: His desire for all to be saved ( God desires all to be saved), His lack of delight in judging the wicked ( God does not delight in the death of the wicked), and His love for the world ( God's love for all).

Election Means "to Choose"

To understand election biblically, we must first recognize that the word simply means "to choose." In its original New Testament context, election wasn't the theological term it has become today, with thousands of years of doctrinal baggage and debate. The word alone does not tell us who was chosen, what they were chosen for, or whether the choice concerns salvation, service, or a nation's role in history. Those questions have to be answered from each passage.

God sovereignly elects a people for His purposes, and He calls each individual to join this chosen people by faith. We believe this choice is freely offered and genuinely available to all.

Choices Set Before Mankind

Throughout the Bible, God places real choices before people. In the Garden of Eden, God brought the animals to Adam "to see what he would call them" (Genesis 2:19). Though God made sovereign choices in creation, He also delegated choice to Adam, illustrating that His divine sovereignty does not negate human free will.

Similarly, in Deuteronomy 30:19, God says, "I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live." Here God sovereignly offers a choice, but the decision is given to the people. Just as Adam named the animals and Israel was told to choose life, God allows individuals to respond to His grace by trusting Christ as their Savior.

The Bible is full of "if" statements and conditions showing that God has laid a true choice before mankind (see conditional promises). God is genuine in these offers. He is not a deceiver or a liar in His commands.

Biblical Categories of Election

Understanding election properly involves recognizing its various biblical applications. Election in Scripture isn't always about salvation; it covers at least four categories:

  1. Election of a nation (Israel)
  2. Election of messengers (prophets and apostles)
  3. Election of hearers (those who receive the gospel)
  4. Election of believers (those in Christ)

Each of these represents a different facet of God's sovereign choices, and together they show that election is not always about individual salvation.

1. Election of a Nation: Israel

God's election of Israel was not about predestining individuals for salvation but about choosing a people through whom He would bring blessing to the world (Genesis 12:3; Deuteronomy 7:6–8). The purpose was corporate: Israel would be the vessel for God's redemptive plan. This election was unconditional in the sense that it wasn't based on Israel's merit, but it served God's purpose to bless all nations. Paul's discussion of Jacob and Esau in Romans 9 belongs here, and we look at it closely in Romans 9:6 - 13.

2. Election of Messengers: Prophets and Apostles

God also elected specific individuals to serve as His messengers. This election was about appointing individuals for a task, not determining their eternal fate. God chose prophets like Jonah and apostles like Paul for specific roles in His redemptive plan. Their election to these tasks didn't remove their freedom to respond to God's call, as Jonah's reluctance shows.

3. Election of Hearers

God's election of hearers refers to how and when the message of salvation reaches various peoples and nations. Romans 1:16 tells us that the gospel is "the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek." This election is not about God deciding in advance which individuals will respond to the gospel, but about His sovereign choice of when and how the message reaches different people groups. The extension of the gospel to the Gentiles shows God broadening His election of hearers to include the whole world: He "commands all people everywhere to repent" (Acts 17:30).

4. Election of Believers: Those in Christ

The election of those in Christ is where the main debate lies between Calvinists and non-Calvinists. Calvinists hold that God decided who will believe. Non-Calvinists understand the election of believers as God's predetermined plan for what will happen to those who trust in Christ. This is often called corporate election: God chose a people in Christ, and individuals share in that chosen identity by being united to Christ through faith.

In Ephesians 1:1 - 13, Paul says God "chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him," and "predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ" (Ephesians 1:4–5). This predestination is about what happens to believers, not about who becomes a believer in the first place. Those who are "in Christ" are predestined for adoption, holiness, and glorification. They are not predestined to be in Christ, as many Calvinists read Ephesians 1.

To summarize the difference, the Calvinist view holds:
If I am one of the elect, then I am predestined to be in Christ.

But Ephesians and other passages teach instead:

If I am in Christ, then I am one of the elect and predestined for adoption and glorification.

Biblical predestination is about what happens to believers, not about who becomes a believer.

The Misapplication of Scripture to Support Unconditional Election

Many passages about God's choices relate to His plan of redemption rather than to individual salvation. Calvinists often cite John 15:16, "You did not choose me, but I chose you," to argue for individual election to salvation. But Jesus is speaking to the disciples about their role as apostles, and the verse continues, "and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit." This is the election of messengers, not a statement about eternal destiny.

Likewise, passages about God choosing Israel, messengers, or hearers should not be conflated with election to salvation. God's choices in these contexts serve His redemptive plan; they do not mean He predestines individuals to salvation or damnation apart from their faith.

God's Choices Are to His Glory

God's sovereign choices often defy human expectations. All of them can be called "unconditional" in the sense that they are not based on morality, strength, nationality, or personal qualities. But Scripture teaches clearly that His promises often come with conditions, and the condition for salvation is to believe: whoever turns and believes will be saved.

A recurring theme in Scripture is that God selects the least likely candidates to fulfill His purposes, so that the glory belongs to Him alone. God chose Israel, not because of their greatness, but precisely because they were small:

It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the LORD set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples.
— Deuteronomy 7:7

Similarly, when Jesus called His apostles, He didn't choose influential or noble men by worldly standards. He selected fishermen, tax collectors, and ordinary people. Paul reminds the church of the same pattern:

For consider your calling, brothers: not many of you were wise according to worldly standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.
— 1 Corinthians 1:26

This pattern runs throughout Scripture, from David being chosen over his older brothers to unlikely prophets like Jonah and Amos. God's ways are not our ways (Isaiah 55:8–9). His choices show that election is about His grace, not human merit, and that He "shows no partiality" (Romans 2:11). His purpose in choosing is to bring the message of salvation to all.

Conclusion

Election is a biblical concept, but its meaning depends on the context. Non-Calvinists affirm election but reject the Calvinist view that God chose some individuals for salvation, and left or ordained others for condemnation, before they were born. Instead, we affirm that God's election is corporate and centered on Christ, with the offer of salvation extended to all. The Bible consistently shows that God desires all to be saved and to come to repentance, and that the choice to accept or reject His grace is genuinely ours.

Simply put, God's election is His choice to accept those who come to Him clothed in the righteousness of Christ (see the Matthew 22:1 - 14), not His choosing who will be in Christ. Predestination is God's plan for believers, not God planning who will be believers.

By understanding election in its biblical categories, we honor God's sovereignty while acknowledging humanity's responsibility to accept Christ's offer of salvation, without trampling the heart and character of God in the process.

Join the conversation

Comments and discussion

Discussion thread

Responses to this proof text and its interpretation.

0 comments